Cleary says that cops have committed perjury. He feels pretty strong about this. We have all had cases where we know the cops lied. But, to take a line from the state attorneys, proving it is another matter. Apparently, John has enough proof to start an IA complaint. But where is the Palm Beach county state attorney’s office? They can neither confirm nor deny anything.
How often are you able to actually prove that cops lied? Sometimes, there is video. That can be very satisfying. But, what about all the other times? Innocent people get convicted. Or, maybe they are not so innocent, but get convicted on illegal evidence. That burns me up.
I suppose the thought process is something like this: Well, we don’t have enough evidence to convict him on this, so we’ll just make some crap up. We know he’s guilty. We know he’s done other things that we can’t prove. So, let’s just lie to get the scumbag off the street. The ends justify the means.
That’s why the exclusionary rule is so important. To deter police misconduct. However, it still will not deter some cops. Why? Because there’s no teeth unless it’s enforced. It starts with judges having the fortitude to grant a motion to suppress. Especially when they see perjury. The public will have more faith in the system if they see bad cops get spanked when they lie.
In addition to suppressing the evidence, what is just when cops lie? At a minimum, suspension, having to pay the “scumbag’s” attorney’s fees and costs, and writing a letter of apology. Maybe even getting fired.
But, apparently, when cops lie in Palm Beach county, nothing happens. And nobody cares.