October 18, 2011
Case Results for criminal client attempted purchase of oxycodone

Charge:    attempted purchase of oxycodone
Palm Beach Judge:        Karen Miller
Disposition:    charges dropped June 28, 2011


Cases

2011CF001900AXXXMB
Charge:    possession of cocaine
Judge:        Kastrenakes
Disposition:    After motion to suppress filed, state dropped charges on 9/19/11 


Cases

2010CF009598AMB
Charge:    possession of schedule II substance; evidence tampering
Judge:        Rapp
Disposition:    Motion to suppress granted.  Case dropped on 7/5/11


Cases

2011CT000012AXXXMB
Charge:    DUI
Judge:        Marni Bryson
Disposition:    Motion to suppress granted.  Case dropped on

"Kinapping of a child"... more coming from Grey soon

Passionate. Caring. Truthful.

855-TESH-LAW

*855-837-4529

561-686-6886

Federal Sentencing Guidelines – National Defense: Prohibited Financial Transactions

As seen on:

Grey Tesh

1610 Southern Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL
33406

Board Certified Criminal Trial Specialist
(561) 686-6886

The following is copied from the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. This section covers offenses involving prohibited financial transactions and exports, and providing material support to designated foreign terrorist organizations.

5.PROHIBITED FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND EXPORTS, AND PROVIDING MATERIAL SUPPORT TO DESIGNATED FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 2002 (see Appendix C, amendment 637).

§2M5.1. Evasion of Export Controls; Financial Transactions with Countries Supporting International Terrorism

(a)Base Offense Level (Apply the greater):

(1)26, if (A) national security controls or controls relating to the proliferation of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons or materials were evaded; or (B) the offense involved a financial transaction with a country supporting international terrorism; or

(2)14, otherwise.

Commentary

Statutory Provisions: 18 U.S.C. § 2332d; 50 U.S.C. App. §§ 2401-2420.

Application Notes:

1.In the case of a violation during time of war or armed conflict, an upward departure may be warranted.

2.In determining the sentence within the applicable guideline range, the court may consider the degree to which the violation threatened a security interest of the United States, the volume of commerce involved, the extent of planning or sophistication, and whether there were multiple occurrences. Where such factors are present in an extreme form, a departure from the guidelines may be warranted. See Chapter Five, Part K (Departures).

3.In addition to the provisions for imprisonment, 50 U.S.C. App. § 2410 contains provisions for criminal fines and forfeiture as well as civil penalties. The maximum fine for individual defendants is $250,000. In the case of corporations, the maximum fine is five times the value of the exports involved or $1 million, whichever is greater. When national security controls are violated, in addition to any other sanction, the defendant is subject to forfeiture of any interest in, security of, or claim against: any goods or tangible items that were the subject of the violation; property used to export or attempt to export that was the subject of the violation; and any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the violation.

4.For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(B), "a country supporting international terrorism" means a country designated under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. App. 2405).

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 2001 (see Appendix C, amendment 633); November 1, 2002 (see Appendix C, amendment 637).

(EFFECTIVE November 1, 2010)


United States Sentencing Commission