October 18, 2011
Case Results for criminal client attempted purchase of oxycodone

Charge:    attempted purchase of oxycodone
Palm Beach Judge:        Karen Miller
Disposition:    charges dropped June 28, 2011


Cases

2011CF001900AXXXMB
Charge:    possession of cocaine
Judge:        Kastrenakes
Disposition:    After motion to suppress filed, state dropped charges on 9/19/11 


Cases

2010CF009598AMB
Charge:    possession of schedule II substance; evidence tampering
Judge:        Rapp
Disposition:    Motion to suppress granted.  Case dropped on 7/5/11


Cases

2011CT000012AXXXMB
Charge:    DUI
Judge:        Marni Bryson
Disposition:    Motion to suppress granted.  Case dropped on

"Kinapping of a child"... more coming from Grey soon

Passionate. Caring. Truthful.

855-TESH-LAW

*855-837-4529

561-686-6886

Gambling Offenses – Animal Fighting Offenses

As seen on:

Grey Tesh

1610 Southern Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL
33406

Board Certified Criminal Trial Specialist
(561) 686-6886

The following is a copy of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The section covers gambling offenses involving animal fighting.

Introductory Commentary

This subpart covers a variety of proscribed conduct. The adjustments in Chapter Three, Part B (Role in the Offense) are particularly relevant in providing a measure of the scope of the offense and the defendant’s participation.

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 1987.

§2E3.1. Gambling Offenses; Animal Fighting Offenses

(a)Base Offense Level: (Apply the greatest)

(1)12, if the offense was (A) engaging in a gambling business; (B) transmission of wagering information; or (C) committed as part of, or to facilitate, a commercial gambling operation; or

(2)10, if the offense involved an animal fighting venture; or

(3)6, otherwise.

Commentary

Statutory Provisions: 7 U.S.C. § 2156; 15 U.S.C. §§ 1172-1175; 18 U.S.C. §§ 1082, 1301-1304, 1306, 1511, 1953, 1955; 31 U.S.C. § 5363. For additional statutory provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory Index).

Application Notes:

1.Definition.—For purposes of this guideline: “Animal fighting venture” has the meaning given that term in 7 U.S.C. § 2156(g).

2.Upward Departure Provision.—If the offense involved extraordinary cruelty to an animal that resulted in, for example, maiming or death to an animal, an upward departure may be warranted.

Historical Note: Effective November 1, 1987. Amended effective November 1, 1993 (see Appendix C, amendment 481); November 1, 2007 (see Appendix C, amendment 703); November 1, 2008 (see Appendix C, amendment 721).

(EFFECTIVE November 1, 2010)


United States Sentencing Commission